Partly cloudy
9 °C
Germantown, Maryland
Partly cloudy

Wed Oct 17 2018
none

WE’LL ALWAYS HAVE PARIS

08-08-2018
by 
in 

When Donald Trump withdrew the USA from the Paris Accord on Climate Change, he gave climate change sceptics around the world a barrage of ammunition with which to derail their own national initiatives. And yet the ammunition remains unfired.

The remainder of the world remains on track to meet (or in most cases beat) the CO2 targets they set and agreed. And – get this – the USA will meet its emissions reduction target with years to spare.

That was never the problem. Trump’s issue with the Paris Accord was that the world’s developed nations are expected to provide financial support for emissions reductions in developing nations.

For a newly elected president keen to be seen to be reducing his nation’s overseas aid bill, this was as easy a decision as it has been to harangue the other members of NATO for not being perceived as pulling their weight.

So it is particularly unfortunate that certain factions within Australia should take the view that “if it’s good enough for the USA, it’s good enough for us”, citing Trump doctrine as being relevant to solving the nation’s energy price crisis.

These are the same factions who cherry-pick soundbites from carefully researched reports and use them to justify their point of view.

Little wonder that Australia’s Chief Scientist Alan Finkel was so outraged when his almost throwaway line that Australia’s emissions reductions would have negligible effect on the global climate was seized on as an excuse to do nothing.

The facts are that Australia will easily achieve its CO2 reductions agreed under the Paris Accord, regardless of any changes to government policy. The targets were set low enough to be attainable.

What is really worrying though is the latest research that suggests other mechanisms of climate change are at work that could well be triggered by the existing levels of human-induced global warming. These so-called natural “feedback” processes have the potential drive further warming - even if we stop emitting greenhouse gases.

Naturally, it is important when talking about climate science to differentiate between theory and scientific observation, and the feedback process theory is currently just that.

But I wouldn’t want to be around if this theory was to become fact.

Related news & editorials

  1. 28.09.2018
    28.09.2018
    by      In
    If there was ever an over-used (and mostly misused) term in the current political lexicon it would have to be the “national interest”. We are told that it would not be in the national interest for Chinese companies to control too much of our national energy infrastructure. And a short while ago it... Read More
  2. 13.09.2018
    13.09.2018
    by      In
    I was intrigued to hear of a study released this week from the University of Waterloo in Canada that concluded that companies should avoid scheduling important work tasks immediately following an election.
    Psychologists from the university surveyed a sample of American voters, asking them to rate... Read More
  3. 07.06.2018
    07.06.2018
    by      In
    Regardless of where you were born, chances are that your youth was punctuated with vacations by the sea and the odd cooling dip in the ocean. Admittedly for those of us from cooler northern climes, these were probably limited to the one month a year that might approximate to summer, but the idea is... Read More
  4. 10.05.2018
    10.05.2018
    by      In
    As if the latest Australian data security legislation wasn’t enough to get your head around, it now seems that we all need to look to Europe and take note of the EU’s new General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which comes into force on 25th May.
    If there’s one thing that the European Union... Read More