Deep boring and turning with extended length tools are common and essential metalcutting operations. Carrying out these processes efficiently requires operators to evaluate the machining system as a whole to ensure that the multiple factors involved in minimising vibration and assuring product quality are working together to achieve maximum productivity and profitability.
Deep boring can distinguished from other cutting operations by the cutting edge operating at an extended distance from the connection to the machine, and long-reach internal turning operations feature similar conditions. Both can involve holes with interrupted cuts, as in workpieces like pump or compressor housings. The amount of resulting tool overhang is dictated by the depth of the hole and can result in deflection of the boring bar or extended-length turning tool.
Deflection magnifies the changing forces in a cutting process and can cause vibration and chatter that degrade the quality of part surfaces, quickly wear or break cutting tools and damage machine tool components, such as spindles, resulting in expensive repairs and long periods of downtime. These forces result from imbalances of machine components, lack of rigidity in the system or sympathetic vibration of elements of the machining system. Cutting pressures also change as chips form and break and the tool is periodically loaded and unloaded. Negative effects of machining vibrations include poor surface finishes, inaccurate bore dimensions, rapid tool wear, reduced material rates, increased production costs and damage to machine tools and tool holders.
To control vibrations in machining operations, the rigidity of the elements in the machining system must be maximised. To restrict unwanted movements, a machine tool should be built with rigid, heavy structural elements reinforced with concrete or other vibration-absorbing material. Machine bearings and bushings must be tight and solid.
Workpieces must be accurately located and securely held within the machine tool. Fixtures should be designed with simplicity and rigidity as primary concerns, and clamps should be located as close as possible to the cutting operations. From a workpiece perspective, thin-walled or welded parts and those with unsupported sections are prone to vibration when machined. Parts can be redesigned to improve rigidity, but such design changes can add weight and compromise performance of the machined product.
To maximise rigidity, a boring bar or turning bar must be as short as possible but remain long enough to machine the entire length of the bore or component. The diameter of the boring bar should be the largest possible that will fit the bore and still permit efficient evacuation of cut chips.
As chips form and break, cutting forces rise and fall. The variations in force become an additional source of vibration that may interact in sympathy with the tool holder’s or machine’s natural mode of vibration and become self-sustaining or even increase. Other sources of vibrations include worn tools and those not taking a deep enough pass. These cause process instability, or resonance that also synchronises with the natural frequency of a machine’s spindle or the tool to then generate unwanted vibrations.
A long boring bar or turning bar overhang can trigger vibration in a machining system. The basic approach to vibration control includes the use of short, rigid tools. The larger the ratio of bar length to diameter, the greater the chance that vibration will occur.
Different bar materials provide different vibration behavior. Steel bars generally are vibration resistant up to a 4:1 length to diameter of bar (L/D) ratio. Heavy metal bars made from tungsten alloys are denser than steel and can handle L/D of bar ratios in the range of 6:1. Solid carbide bars provide higher rigidity and permit L/D of bar ratios up to 8:1, along with the possible disadvantage of higher cost, especially where a large-diameter bar is required.
An alternative way to damp vibrations involves a tunable bar. This features an internal mass damper designed to resonate out of phase with the unwanted vibration, absorb its energy and minimise the vibratory motion. The Steadyline system from Seco Tools, for example, features a pre-tuned vibration damper consisting of a damper mass made of high-density material suspended inside the toolholder bar via radial absorbing elements. The damper mass absorbs vibration immediately when it is transmitted by the cutting tool to the body of the bar.
More complex and expensive active tooling vibration control can take the form of electronically activated devices that sense the existence of vibration and use electronic actuators to produce secondary motion in the toolholder to cancel the unwanted movement.
The cutting characteristics of the workpiece material may contribute to the generation of vibration. The hardness of the material, a tendency to built-up edge or work hardening, or the presence of hard inclusions alter or interrupt cutting forces and may generate vibrations. To some degree, adjusting cutting parameters can minimise vibrations when machining certain materials.
The cutting tool itself is subject to tangential and radial deflection. Radial deflection affects the accuracy of the bore diameter. In tangential deflection the insert is forced downward away from the part centerline. Especially when boring small diameter holes, the curving internal diameter of the hole reduces the clearance angle between the insert and the bore.
Tangential deflection will push the tool downward and away from the centerline of the component being machined, reducing the clearance angle. Radial deflection reduces cutting depth, affecting machining accuracy and altering chip thickness. The changes in depth of cut alter cutting forces and can result in vibration.
Insert geometry features including rake, lead angle and nose radius can either magnify or damp vibration. Positive rake inserts, for instance, create less tangential cutting force. But the positive rake angle configuration can reduce clearance, which can lead to rubbing and vibration. A large rake angle and small edge angle produce a sharp cutting edge, which reduces cutting forces. However, the sharp edge may be subject to impact damage or uneven wear, which will affect surface finish of the bore.
A small cutting edge lead angle produces larger axial cutting forces, while a large lead angle produces force in the radial direction. Axial forces have limited effect on boring operations, so a small lead angle can be desirable. But a small lead angle also concentrates cutting forces on a smaller section of the cutting edge than a large lead angle, with possible negative effect on tool life. In addition, a tool’s lead angle affects chip thickness and the direction of chip flow. The insert nose radius should be smaller than the cutting depth to minimise radial cutting forces.
Clearing the cut chips from the bore is a key issue in boring operations. Insert geometry, cutting speeds and workpiece material cutting characteristics all influence chip control. Short chips are desirable in boring because they are easier to evacuate from the bore and minimise forces on the cutting edge, but the highly contoured insert geometries designed to break chips tend to consume more power and may cause vibration.
Operations intended to create a good surface finish may require a light depth of cut that will produce thinner chips that magnify the chip control problem. Increasing feed rate may break chips but can increase cutting forces and generate chatter, which can negatively affect surface finishes. Higher feed rates can also cause built-up edges when machining low carbon steels, so higher cutting feed rates along with optimum internal coolant supply may be a chip control solution when boring these more malleable steel alloys.
1300 557 326