Jobkeeper scheme vital but needs refinement


Industry Update has consistently supported federal and state government stimulus measures, including the Commonwealth’s $130 billion JobKeeper scheme.

Jobkeeper is essential for protecting jobs and businesses through what is a tough time for so many. The government is to be commended for putting anxieties about debt and deficit aside and introducing such a bold scheme given the present economic fragility.

Nevertheless, there are anomalies in the scheme that prevent it from achieving the goal of protecting jobs and businesses as well as it could.

Firstly, many casual workers are excluded from the scheme. Casual workers are only eligible if they have been working consistently with the claiming employer for a year or more. This excludes a massive share of Australia’s workforce. Around a quarter of Australian employees are casual, with employers relying on this form of employment to deliver the flexibility they need in a modern labour market.

Secondly, the funding is poorly targeted, with the perverse outcome of increasing the pay of employees on relatively low pay – delivering publicly funded wages of up to $1,500 a fortnight for workers who only work a couple of hours a week – while providing relatively little contribution to those employees on higher incomes. This is just bad design.

There is no rationale for increasing wages, which do nothing to help employers hold onto workers. The money wasted on wage hikes would be better spent on a larger subsidy towards workers on higher incomes, who are obviously harder for cash constrained businesses to keep paying. Recognition of this point has led virtually every other country that has implemented a wage subsidy to do so based on a percentage of the worker's income.

As a fall back, employers should have greater flexibility to reallocate any surplus JobKeeper funds above an employee’s regular wage across to support the wages of other employees.

Finally, the government urgently needs to recognise businesses who need support to replace departing employees. At present, such employers would not be eligible for the subsidy to transfer over to the new employee. This makes no sense. Retirement of a worker should not blow a permanent hole in a business’s finances.

The JobKeeper scheme could be significantly improved with some simple and commonsense reforms. We call on the government to act.

Related news & editorials

  1. 10.08.2020
    by      In
    Love them or hate them, face masks have become a tenet of the “new normal” reality of life with COVID-19.
    As the debate over whether to wear them or not continues to rage around the world, Industry Update has put together the most accurate information possible surrounding the use and efficacy of... Read More
  2. 10.08.2020
    by      In
    Australia’s national science agency has launched the nation’s first accredited surgical face mask testing facility in Melbourne.
    The new facility, accredited by the National Association of Testing Authorities (NATA), is designed to help frontline health workers in the fight against COVID-19. It has... Read More
  3. 10.08.2020
    by      In
    In the wake of its Port Pirie success, Bentley’s Cabin Parks will soon open its new fully self-contained accommodation park at Port Augusta.
    Part of the Bentley Group, the cabin park division was established in 1995 when founder and managing director Hayden Bentley, inspired by his travels around... Read More
  4. 05.08.2020
    by      In
    In terms of the economy, COVID-19 has had a catastrophic effect on the sales industry.
    The true emotional cost on those responsible for making those sales, however, is harder to quantify.
    Ironically, says Hazel Stewart, managing director of Australian corporate sales training company Innovate Learn... Read More