Jobkeeper scheme vital but needs refinement


Industry Update has consistently supported federal and state government stimulus measures, including the Commonwealth’s $130 billion JobKeeper scheme.

Jobkeeper is essential for protecting jobs and businesses through what is a tough time for so many. The government is to be commended for putting anxieties about debt and deficit aside and introducing such a bold scheme given the present economic fragility.

Nevertheless, there are anomalies in the scheme that prevent it from achieving the goal of protecting jobs and businesses as well as it could.

Firstly, many casual workers are excluded from the scheme. Casual workers are only eligible if they have been working consistently with the claiming employer for a year or more. This excludes a massive share of Australia’s workforce. Around a quarter of Australian employees are casual, with employers relying on this form of employment to deliver the flexibility they need in a modern labour market.

Secondly, the funding is poorly targeted, with the perverse outcome of increasing the pay of employees on relatively low pay – delivering publicly funded wages of up to $1,500 a fortnight for workers who only work a couple of hours a week – while providing relatively little contribution to those employees on higher incomes. This is just bad design.

There is no rationale for increasing wages, which do nothing to help employers hold onto workers. The money wasted on wage hikes would be better spent on a larger subsidy towards workers on higher incomes, who are obviously harder for cash constrained businesses to keep paying. Recognition of this point has led virtually every other country that has implemented a wage subsidy to do so based on a percentage of the worker's income.

As a fall back, employers should have greater flexibility to reallocate any surplus JobKeeper funds above an employee’s regular wage across to support the wages of other employees.

Finally, the government urgently needs to recognise businesses who need support to replace departing employees. At present, such employers would not be eligible for the subsidy to transfer over to the new employee. This makes no sense. Retirement of a worker should not blow a permanent hole in a business’s finances.

The JobKeeper scheme could be significantly improved with some simple and commonsense reforms. We call on the government to act.

Related news & editorials

  1. 29.10.2020
    by      In
    National employer association Ai Group has attacked states over their continuing border restrictions, warning that they are putting at risk their economic recovery and the jobs of the community.
    "The remaining state and territory border restrictions are becoming more unjustifiable as each day... Read More
  2. 28.10.2020
    by      In
    Having the correct footwear is crucial to the wearer’s wellbeing and comfort when working in dynamic environments, not just for accident prevention but maximising protection.
    A foot injury can be debilitating and create difficulty when performing a job which is why leading distributors in... Read More
  3. 28.10.2020
    by      In
    The green and gold kangaroo on Australian Made logo has confirmed its international appeal with new Horizon Consumer Science research finding that 97 per cent of overseas consumers have a positive first impression.
      The research, which was carried out in six diverse export markets, found that more... Read More
  4. 27.10.2020
    by      In
    The Morrison government is helping fast-track the world’s largest green hydrogen and ammonia production facility, which is expected to create tens of thousands of jobs in Western Australia.
    The proposed Asian Renewable Energy Hub (AREH) in the Pilbara region is expected to support more than 20,000... Read More