Production managers in manufacturing often have to consider whether they should continue with conventional machining and coolant lubricants, or whether dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) are viable alternatives. Several factors influence this decision.
Part 1 of this two-part series of technical articles being published in the run-up to EMO Hannover 2019 looks at the issue from the perspective of lubrication system experts and scientists. Part 2 will present the views of tool and machine manufacturers.
Very high temperatures are generated in the cutting zone during machining. Coolant lubricants reduce friction, provide cooling (but may also cause destructive thermal shocks) and support the removal of chips. Twenty years ago, some experts were predicting dry machining would make a breakthrough as a alternative process. It is now time to assess the current position: in which areas have this process, or minimum quantity lubrication (as quasi-dry machining), become established, and to what extent?
In this two-part technical report, lubrication system manufacturers, scientists, and machine and tool suppliers provide a comprehensive assessment from various perspectives and identify the advantages and disadvantages of the respective technologies.
Particular relevance for series machining
“The main area of application for minimum quantity lubrication lies in the machining of prototype parts as found in large-scale series production in the automotive industry – especially of powertrains,” says Jürgen Keppler, a technical sales specialist at bielomatik Leuze GmbH & Co KG in Neuffen, Germany, an engineering company specialising in the development and manufacture of high-quality MQL systems. “The parts range from the cylinder head and engine block to the crankshaft or camshaft, connecting rod, gearbox and wheel carrier.
“Further industrial applications include the machining of cubic components and mechanical engineering castings such as fittings, pump housings or valves. It is a great advantage in the aviation industry, too, if complex components are not flooded with emulsion.”
He estimates that MQL is used for machining about 15 per cent of new large-series components, rising to 70 per cent for deep hole drilling in crankshafts, for example.
“MQL will continue to grow in the other application areas I just mentioned,” he says, convinced. “The upswing in MQL machining predicted some 20 years ago has mainly occurred in the automotive sector. Here, the advantages of MQL could be fully exploited in the machining of cast and forged parts. The high quantities involved also allowed the related R&D work to be carried out. New application areas will also arise from the forthcoming changes in e-mobility and additive manufacturing. The great advantage of MQL lies in the cost savings to be made in resources such as oil, water and energy.”
Further advantages are dry workpieces, no carry-over of emulsion and contamination in the production bays, and the prevention of associated health risks.
“The constant further development of materials and applications is placing new demands on machining processes and thus on MQL systems,” says Keppler. “This will certainly result in interesting solutions.”
What do the scientists say?
“Thanks to modern cutting materials, dry machining has been introduced in almost all areas of machining production,” says Dr Ivan Iovkov, Head of Cutting Technology at the Institute of Machining Technology ISF of the Technical University of Dortmund. “Increasing cost pressure, but also energy consumption and ecological aspects are leading to a renaissance of these technologies. Dry machining is not only used in conventional milling or turning. There are also efforts to minimise or completely avoid the use of coolant lubricants in complex processes such as deep drilling and gear hobbing. However, the cutting processes and the technology still need to be adapted in certain ways.”
Dry machining tends to be more common in big companies which process larger quantities than in smaller companies which specialise in varying types of high-precision and complex components.
“I think there will be both dry and wet machining in the future,” he predicts. “We need to take a holistic view of production when deciding whether dry machining makes sense or whether it will involve disproportionately high process adaptation costs. The continuous further development of MQL device technology and coatings, the increasing accuracy of the machine park, but also digitalisation – for example through in-process sensor monitoring of relevant variables – will make it possible in the future to carry out more and more dry or MQL machining under robust practical conditions.”
It is too soon to speak of conventional machining processes being comprehensively replaced by dry machining or MQL, as wet machining, which involves larger quantities of coolant lubricant, still accounts for an estimated 85 per cent of machining. Nevertheless, dry processes are conquering more and more applications, both in the general machining sector and above all in special areas. In Part 2, tool and machine manufacturers take a practical view of the different production technologies and recommend adopting a holistic approach.