none
none

GOVERNMENT CAN LEAD BY EXAMPLE IN PROMPT PAYMENT

13-04-2017
by 
in 

Even with the government’s recent success in improving tax conditions for Australian companies turning over $50 million or less, smaller businesses still face many challenges in today’s Australian economy. And one of the biggest of these is maintaining cashflow.

Big business, it seems isn’t playing fair. And the (admittedly optimistic) 30-day terms on which we all base our business plans are a distant memory, stretching to 60, 90, and even 120 days as a matter of course.

Little wonder, then, that the Federal Small Business Ombudsman Kate Carnell has accused Australia’s top businesses of treating their smaller counterparts as sources of low-cost (or free) credit.

The accusations come as a result of a survey, carried out by the ombudsman’s office, which took submissions from 3000 small businesses.

Carnell has proposed a number of measures to rectify the situation. These range from federal legislation to ensure compliance with 30-day terms to mandating the 100 top businesses in the country to report twice a year on their payment times.

Sadly, though, she is unlikely to find too many supporters in a Government that is committed to removing red tape, rather than increasing it.

However, one measure that does deserve support is her call for the Australian Government to follow the example set by the US Government and reduce its own settlement terms to 15 days.

A recent review by Harvard Business School found that the policy change had created 75,000 jobs and delivered $6 billion into US workers' pay packets.

What’s more, the US Government’s example set off a wave of conscience among blue chip companies, which rushed to sign up to President Obama’s SupplierPay Initiative, committing themselves to reduce their payment terms to small business to match those of the government.

Leading by example? Perhaps that’s a lesson for governments worldwide.

Related news & editorials

  1. Laurence MarchiniLEVELLING THE PLAYING FIELD FOR AUSTRALIAN STEEL  Last week’s long awaited report from the Senate Economics References Committee into the Australian steel industry has much to say about the problems facing the industry. But does it have any practical strategies that the current Government is likely to implement?  The report includes no fewer than 28 recommendations, but an alarming number of these are that the Government should reconsider its responses to the report from the Joint Standing
    06.12.2017
    06.12.2017
    by      In
    Last week’s long awaited report from the Senate Economics References Committee into the Australian steel industry has much to say about the problems facing the industry. But does it have any practical strategies that the current Government is likely to implement?
    The report includes no fewer than... Read More
  2. 14.11.2017
    14.11.2017
    by      In
    Perhaps it’s just a sign of the times. But in 1962 in the UK when my Father bought me my first model railway he went to a local shop and bought a British-made Tri-ang train set.
    Were that to have happened today, perhaps he would have gone online, found the best price and ordered me a train set from... Read More
  3. Laurence Marchini
    23.10.2017
    23.10.2017
    by      In
    Was it product diversity that really killed the Australian automotive assembly industry? Changing tastes, changing economies and an ever-greater choice of vehicles have all played their role.
    Nobody can dispute that there are many more different makes and models available now than there were even... Read More
  4. Laurence Marchini
    16.10.2017
    16.10.2017
    by      In
    When the initial announcements were made of the impending closures of the Toyota and Holden vehicle assembly operations in Victoria and South Australia, there were some pretty dire predictions made about the full implications.
    In addition to the widespread layoffs at the carmakers themselves, there... Read More