Australia’s Number 1 Manufacturing & Industrial Equipment Magazine & Directory
GOVERNMENT CAN LEAD BY EXAMPLE IN PROMPT PAYMENT
Even with the government’s recent success in improving tax conditions for Australian companies turning over $50 million or less, smaller businesses still face many challenges in today’s Australian economy. And one of the biggest of these is maintaining cashflow.
Big business, it seems isn’t playing fair. And the (admittedly optimistic) 30-day terms on which we all base our business plans are a distant memory, stretching to 60, 90, and even 120 days as a matter of course.
Little wonder, then, that the Federal Small Business Ombudsman Kate Carnell has accused Australia’s top businesses of treating their smaller counterparts as sources of low-cost (or free) credit.
The accusations come as a result of a survey, carried out by the ombudsman’s office, which took submissions from 3000 small businesses.
Carnell has proposed a number of measures to rectify the situation. These range from federal legislation to ensure compliance with 30-day terms to mandating the 100 top businesses in the country to report twice a year on their payment times.
Sadly, though, she is unlikely to find too many supporters in a Government that is committed to removing red tape, rather than increasing it.
However, one measure that does deserve support is her call for the Australian Government to follow the example set by the US Government and reduce its own settlement terms to 15 days.
A recent review by Harvard Business School found that the policy change had created 75,000 jobs and delivered $6 billion into US workers' pay packets.
What’s more, the US Government’s example set off a wave of conscience among blue chip companies, which rushed to sign up to President Obama’s SupplierPay Initiative, committing themselves to reduce their payment terms to small business to match those of the government.
Leading by example? Perhaps that’s a lesson for governments worldwide.
Related news & editorials
27.03.2017by Laurence Marchini In Editor's EditorialThere was a joke doing the rounds not so far back along the lines of:
“How do you make a small business?”
“Start with a large one and manage it badly.”
Regardless, the current rules that define a small enterprise as one with a turnover under $2 million is seriously out of step with the 21st century... Read More
03.03.2017by Laurence Marchini In Editor's EditorialWho would be an economic forecaster? And who would make major financial decisions based on the latest crop of economic data?
Over the past two months or so, the messages have been so mixed as to confuse even the most level headed of observers. (And, despite the timing, we can’t blame the US... Read More
22.02.2017by Laurence Marchini In Editor's EditorialWhile the recently unveiled changes to the New South Wales HSC curriculum have met with cautious approval for their attempt to redress the perceived gap in our children’s appreciation of science, engineering and technology, they can only ever be a small part of the national effort that is required... Read More
07.02.2017by Laurence Marchini In Editor's EditorialIf the past 12 months have taught us anything, it is probably not to put too much credence in opinion polls.
I was in the UK in the lead up to the Brexit vote, and there was absolutely no way that the electorate would ever vote the country out of Europe (if you believed the polls).
Similarly, late... Read More